中国经济问题 ›› 2025›› Issue (05): 186-.
• • 上一篇
出版日期:
发布日期:
Online:
Published:
摘要:
针对雷茜之、纪翔的商榷文章,本文从三个方面予以回应:首先,劳动力作为商品的特殊设定削弱了劳动价值论的内在统一性,马克思对劳动力商品价值的两种定义在原有理论框架下存在一定的矛盾;其次,“人” 与 “劳动者” 的概念不同,即成为商品的是社会意义上的 “劳动者” 而不是生理意义上的 “人” ;最后,针对劳动力商品的价值问题尤其是教育问题展开分析,指出价值衡量问题的困难和进一步研究的必要性。本文认为在理论上构建劳动者商品理论,对运用劳动价值论分析当代资本主义社会问题具有重要意义。
关键词: 劳动者商品, 劳动力价值, 教育问题, 价值衡量
Abstract:
In response to the discussion articles by Lei Qianzhi and Ji Xiang, this article responds from three aspects: Firstly, the special setting of labour-power as a commodity weakens the inherent unity of the Labour Theory of Value, and Marx's two definitions of the value of labour-power commodity have certain contradictions within the original theoretical framework; Secondly, the concepts of “man” and “labourer” are different, that is, what becomes a commodity is the social "labourer" rather than the physiological “man”; Finally, an analysis is conducted on the value of labour-power commodities, especially education, pointing out the difficulties in measuring value and the necessity for further research. This article believes that constructing a Labourer Commodity Theory is of great significance for analyzing contemporary capitalist social issues using the Labour Theory of Value.
Key words: labourer commodity, value of labour-power, education issues, value measurement
labourer commodity,
李梁栋 吕景春. 再论“劳动者商品论”成立的可能性和必要性———对雷茜之、纪翔二君商榷文章的回应[J]. 中国经济问题, 2025,(05): 186-.
LI Liangdong, LV Jingchun. [J]. China Economic Studies, 2025, (05): 186-.
/ 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://ces.xmu.edu.cn/CN/
https://ces.xmu.edu.cn/CN/Y2025/V05/I05/186