中国经济问题 ›› 2025›› Issue (03): 152-.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

区域协同发展政策如何影响企业异地投资———来自京津冀的微观证据

  

  • 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-07-16

  • Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-07-16

摘要:

基于京津冀地区上市企业在2008-2020年期间的异地投资数据使用倍差法研究了2014年“京津冀协同发展”战略对于企业异地投资的影响。研究发现:区域协同发展政策促进了企业在京津冀地区的异地投资,该结论经过一系列稳健性检验依旧成立。机制分析表明,产业政策、交通一体化以及制度环境都会对政策效果产生影响。异质性分析表明,政策效应对于政府效率较高的城市更为明显,政策实施后企业投资偏重于消费制造业、服务业而非装备制造业。进一步研究发现,政策没有产生企业投资在区域间的转移现象,而是具有一定的净增长效应。同时政策实施后民营企业的投资数量与子公司生存能力明显高于国有企业,表明政策激发了市场活力。除此之外,企业投资在区域间的流向分布并不均衡,中心城市的带动效应有待进一步提高。本文的研究对于从微观层面理解京津冀区域协同发展的政策影响具有重要政策含义,也为评估相关政策建设绩效提供了经验证据。

关键词:

区域协同发展, 异地投资, 营商环境, 投资流向

Abstract:

Based on the data of crossregion investment of listed enterprises in the BeijingTianjinHebei region from 2008 to 2020, this paper studies the impact of the "Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development" strategy on cross-region investment of enterprises in 2014 by using multiple difference method. It is found that the regional coordinated development policy promotes the cross-region investment of enterprises in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and this conclusion is still valid after a series of robustness tests. Mechanism analysis shows that industrial policy, transportation integration, institutional environment will have an impact on the policy effect.Heterogeneity analysis shows that, on the one hand, the policy effect is more obvious for cities with higher government efficiency; On the other hand, after the implementation of the policy, enterprise investment is more focused on consumer manufacturing and service industry rather than equipment manufacturing. Further research shows that the policy does not produce the transfer of enterprise investment between regions, but has a certain net growth effect. Meanwhile, the amount of investment and the viability of subsidiaries of private enterprises were significantly higher than that of state-owned enterprises after the implementation of the policy, indicating that the policy stimulated the market vitality.In addition, the flow of enterprises' cross-region investment between regions is not balanced, and the industrial spillover effect of central cities is still insufficient. The findings of this paper have important policy implications for understanding the policy impact of the coordinated development of the BeijingTianjinHebei region from the micro level,and provide empirical evidence for evaluating the construction performance of relevant policies. 

Key words:

regional coordinated development, cross-region investment, business environment, investment flow